Bingol, B N; Arditi, D and Polat, G (2024) A performance-based subcontractor selection model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(8): 04024079, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
General contractors outsource increasingly complex and sophisticated specialized tasks to many subcontractors. In doing so, general contractors typically pick the subcontractor that offers the lowest price for the work to be done, but an informed decision can be made only if the general contractor can assess potential subcontractors' performance before hiring them. The performance of subcontractor candidates is measured in this study by using key performance indicators (KPIs) identified after an extensive review of previous research. These KPIs, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the evidential reasoning (ER) method are combined to create a performance-based subcontractor selection (PBSS) model. The proposed model is generalizable and can help general contractors to assess the performance of subcontractor candidates relative to the general contractor's critical objectives including subcontractor performance in relation to price, duration, quality, safety, and environmental impact. The model is scalable in that other objectives can be added or can replace existing ones depending on the characteristics of the project and the preferences of the general contractor. A real-world case study was used to show that this model was easily implemented and that it generated practical results. A general contractor can use PBSS confidently to evaluate the overall performance of each subcontractor candidate before they select one for a specific part of the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process; evidential reasoning; key performance indicators; performance measurement; subcontractor selection |
| Index terms: | reasoning, general contractor, environmental impact, preference, performance-based, subcontractor selection, subcontractor, performance measurement, case study, key performance indicator, duration |
| Subjects: | practitioner, environmental impact, organization, data collection methods, project delivery, decision-making and reasoning, performance measurement, cognitive psychology, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here