Combining stakeholder and risk management: Multilayer network analysis for complex megaprojects

Castelblanco, G; Fenoaltea, E M; De Marco, A; Demagistris, P; Petruzzi, S and Zeppegno, D (2024) Combining stakeholder and risk management: Multilayer network analysis for complex megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(2): 04023161, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Although megaprojects are complex socio-technical systems that cannot be fully understood by analyzing their components in an isolated way, integrated approaches combining risk and stakeholder analyses remain underdeveloped in the literature. This study proposes a multilayer network analysis that integrates economic transactions between stakeholders and risks to identify discrepancies that may lead to underperformance. This technique was implemented in an Italian megaproject case. The comparison between traditional stakeholders and the proposed multidimensional risk-stakeholder networks reveals the capacity of the latter to accurately capture misalignments between multiple dimensions, such as risk allocation, economic transactions, and project performance. While previous studies have explored one-dimensional networks involving either stakeholders or risks, the novel approach proposed in this paper integrates both dimensions. This research contributes to stakeholder and risk management theory by highlighting the significance of combined stakeholder-risk multilayer networks and introducing a multidimensional approach to quantitatively assess risk propagation and its impact on project outcomes while considering the stakeholders' role.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: integrated management; megaproject; public-private partnership; risk management; risk propagation; social network analysis; stakeholder management
Index terms: stakeholder network, socio-technical system, stakeholder management, misalignment, megaproject, integrated approach, stakeholder analysis, social network analysis, propagation, project performance, risk management, risk allocation, dimension, network analysis, partnership, multilayer, project outcome
Subjects: strategic project management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, participation process, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, project completion, engineering process, risk assessment, engineering problems, partnership management, specialized materials and systems, research methods, theoretical framing, financial risk, project management theory and practice
Topics: Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here