Dahalan, N H; Rahman, R A; Hassan, S H and Ahmad, S W (2024) Public assessment for environmental management plan implementation: Comparative study of performance indicators of road and highway construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 05024006, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Road and highway construction projects are often a concern among surrounding communities as these projects possess significant risks to the environment, and their impacts can reach far beyond the project areas. Monitoring the environmental management plan (EMP) implementation of road and highway construction projects is challenging as it requires a high level of human resources. Thus, allowing the public to assess and report any potential misconduct in road and highway construction projects can help monitor EMP performances. This study aims to compare key performance indicators (PIs) for assessing EMP implementation in road and highway construction projects. To achieve the aim, the study objectives are to (1) determine the key PIs for road and highway construction projects, (2) develop underlying components that categorize interrelated PIs, and (3) compare the underlying components between road and highway construction projects. To achieve those objectives, this study first develops a questionnaire survey by conducting a systematic literature review and semistructured interviews with industry professionals. Throughout the process, 39 PIs for assessing EMP performances have been identified. Then, a questionnaire survey was developed using the PIs and distributed to environmental professionals, collecting 111 valid responses. Finally, the data for the study were analyzed using mean score ranking, factor analysis, and agreement analysis among the two project types. This study has identified 18 and 21 key PIs for assessing EMP implementation in road and highway construction projects. The key PIs can be categorized under four underlying components for both types of construction projects: geological, pollution, environmental change, and ecological for roads, and pollution, ecological, public safety, and geological for highways. This study adds to the environmental management literature by comparing potential PIs for road and highway construction projects, potentially helping policymakers and industry practitioners develop public assessments for EMP implementation of road and highway construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | systematic literature review, factor analysis, monitoring, practitioner, construction project, key performance indicator, questionnaire, pollution, interview, implementation, environmental management, public safety, environmental change, survey, comparative study, human resource, highway construction, performance indicator |
| Subjects: | climate science, environmental health, sustainability assessment, emergency and crisis management, statistical analysis, performance management, research evaluation and metrics, civil engineering, contractual arrangements, production management, research design and methodology, project delivery, data collection methods, management, control systems, practitioner |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Quality Management, Human Resources, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here