A framework for social network interventions in AEC teams: Strategies and implications

Duva, M; Mollaoglu, S; Zhao, D and Frank, K A (2024) A framework for social network interventions in AEC teams: Strategies and implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(2): 05023016, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Successful execution of a project depends on efficient collaborations among a diverse set of actors and organizations. Establishing efficient collaboration networks is vital to channeling necessary expertise to achieve desirable outcomes. Network interventions describe the process of using network-supported strategies to enable knowledge sharing and coordination critical for network performance. However, there is a lack of intervention studies in the architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) domain. To fill this gap in the literature, this study used social network analysis (SNA) and mixed methods to develop an intervention framework for AEC teams. The research team examined the performance and communication trends of an AEC project team during project delivery in light of the literature to inform network interventions. After vetting the developed strategies through interviews with select project leaders, interventions were presented to the whole project team for further verification and feedback. The results contribute to the body of knowledge by providing an intervention framework for AEC teams and implications for practitioners in selecting and assigning experts in key roles and positions in projects as well as managing team communications and networks in a dynamic manner during project delivery for improved team and project performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge transfers; social network analysis; social network interventions; team coordination
Index terms: social network analysis, social network, strategy, knowledge sharing, interview, network interventions, body of knowledge, collaboration, practitioner, knowledge transfer, mixed method, project delivery, coordination, project team, project performance
Subjects: data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, practitioner, communication, project delivery, knowledge management, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, sociology
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here