Kinesiology-inspired assessment of intrusion risk based on human motion features

Huang, H; Hu, H; Xu, F and Zhang, Z (2024) Kinesiology-inspired assessment of intrusion risk based on human motion features. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024072, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Intrusion behavior in hazardous areas is one of the major causes of construction safety accidents including falls from height and strikes by objects. Implementing automatic and preassessment of intrusions to enhance safety performance is of great importance in construction areas. Traditional behavioral safety management mainly relies on manual observation, which makes it difficult to accurately identify detailed changes in behavioral posture, while the results of risk analysis are susceptible to bias due to subjective factors. The emergence of artificial intelligence techniques and computer vision has provided new solutions for human behavior detection in recent years. Accurate vision-based skeleton extraction helps capture detailed behavioral information. Current studies generally focus on intrusion after the occurrence and rarely select metrics considering complex human motion features. It is difficult to accurately assess the potential intrusion risk, resulting in inefficient ex-ante safety management outcomes. This paper presents a novel intrusion assessment approach by integrating human kinematics to extract risk indicators and apply objective assessment methods for risk quantification. An indoor experiment with control groups was conducted by employing skeleton detection technology with safety knowledge to demonstrate its feasibility and effectiveness. The risk levels of the different activities were compared through a control group experimental analysis. The results show that a satisfying accuracy of intrusion assessment can be achieved for different workers. Appropriate warning and intervention methods can be implemented to mitigate the occurrence or reduce the severity of intrusions, thus reducing safety incidents on construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; ex-ante risk assessment; human motion feature; intrusion behavior; skeleton detection
Index terms: falls, quantification, artificial intelligence, risk assessment, effectiveness, construction site, accuracy, experiment, human behaviour, computer vision, construction safety, risk analysis, safety management, safety performance, emergence, bias
Subjects: data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, work location, artificial intelligence, health risk and incident analysis, performance management, computer vision, professional development, probability and distributions, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, environmental hazards, environmental health, systems engineering
Topics: Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here