Major factors influencing safety knowledge-sharing behaviors of construction field workers: Worker-to-worker level safety communication

Ishdorj, S; Ahn, C R and Park, M (2024) Major factors influencing safety knowledge-sharing behaviors of construction field workers: Worker-to-worker level safety communication. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(4): 04024021, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction projects are known for their dynamic and everchanging nature, characterized by frequent adjustments and temporary durations. Consequently, workers must be aware of evolving hazards and promptly share safety-related knowledge and information with colleagues. Despite extensive prior research conducted on knowledge-sharing behavior within the construction industry, there is a lack of studies focusing on the factors that affect the safety knowledge-sharing behaviors (SKSB) of construction field workers (CFWs) who work in the most hazardous frontline positions at construction sites. Therefore, this study aims to identify the major factors influencing SKSB among CFWs and examine their relationships. To achieve this, the study adopts the theory of reasoned action as the theoretical framework supplemented by a comprehensive literature review that identifies four influential factors. A questionnaire survey involving 252 CFWs from 16 construction sites in South Korea was conducted, and the responses of 146 participants were analyzed using social network analysis and structural equation modeling. By advancing research on SKSB of CFWs and group-level construction safety management, the findings can improve safety communication among CFWs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction field workers; safety communication; safety knowledge-sharing behavior; theory of reasoned action
Index terms: construction site, structural equation modelling, literature review, social network analysis, survey, construction safety, construction project, influential factor, questionnaire, South Korea, construction industry, duration, theory of reasoned action
Subjects: statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, environmental health, industry analysis, project controls, Geography, production management, research methods, data analysis and analytics, work location, risk assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Time Control, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here