Koc, K; Budayan, C; Ekmekcioǧlu, Ö and Tokdemir, O B (2024) Predicting cost impacts of nonconformances in construction projects using interpretable machine learning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(1): 04023143, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Nonconformance (NCR) has long been a subject of research interest for its potential to extrapolate information leading to a more productive environment in construction projects. Despite a variety of traditional attempts, a systematic understanding of how machine learning (ML) approaches can contribute to proactively detecting the severity of NCRs remains limited. This study aims to develop a data-driven ML framework to predict the cost impacts of NCRs (high severity versus low severity) in construction projects. To accomplish this aim, the random forest (RF) algorithm reinforced with a metaheuristic hyperparameter-tuning strategy, namely the gravitational search algorithm (GSA), is adopted for the binary classification problem. Furthermore, this study incorporates the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) ensuring transparent interpretations into the GSA-RF predictive framework to tackle the inherent black-box nature of the ML rationale. The results reveal that the proposed model detects the severity of NCRs in terms of their cost impact with an overall AUROC value of 0.776 for the preseparated and blinded testing set. This indicates that the proposed model can be used confidently for newly introduced datasets from real-life cases. In addition, the SHAP analysis results emphasized the role of season, inadequate application procedure, and NCR type in detecting the severity of NCRs. Overall, this research not only makes an important contribution through its novel data-driven approaches but also provides insights for project managers concerning productivity improvements in the sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost of quality; explainable artificial intelligence; nonconformance; quality failures; tree-based ensemble model |
| Index terms: | artificial intelligence, strategy, dataset, machine learning, productivity, forest, construction project, testing, project manager |
| Subjects: | profession, professional practice, environmental science, production management, artificial intelligence, data management, management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here