Koo, H J; Kelly, D and Deman, D (2024) Risk assessment of the challenges in the adaptive reuse of historic buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(9): 04024119, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
To create a resilient environment, adaptive reuse of old buildings is becoming rampant through renovation, restoration, or refurbishment. Although such efforts bring advantages by preserving heritage assets while accommodating current needs, the challenges involved in this type of project are compelling. Therefore, this study is focused on assessing the risk level of common challenges in historic building renovation and restoration projects. By conducting a survey of industry practitioners, this study identified that the common challenges have a higher average frequency than their corresponding severity rankings. Also, the survey responses indicated schematic design estimates should include the highest contingency. This study has contributed to the body of knowledge in the adaptive reuse of buildings and risk management research domain by revealing the risk level of challenges in historical building renovation and restoration projects. Moreover, this study allows industry practitioners to better manage this type of project by understanding the relative frequency and severity of common challenges.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building rehabilitation; heritage building adaptive reuse; historic renovation; risk management |
| Index terms: | restoration, estimate, heritage building conservation, practitioner, historic building, body of knowledge, historical building, becoming, survey, adaptive reuse, risk assessment, risk management, renovation, heritage building |
| Subjects: | financial risk, renovation and retrofit, financial and cost management, philosophical process, knowledge management, construction type, risk assessment, sustainable design, heritage and conservation, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Information Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here