Ma, Z; Liu, W; Li, C; Sang, Y; Zhang, Y; Li, G and Xu, Y (2024) Research on energy-saving control strategy of loader based on intelligent identification of working stages. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024075, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
An energy-saving control strategy for wheel loaders is proposed in this paper to address the issue of high energy consumption during their operation. The strategy is based on the intelligent identification of working stages, allowing for staged power matching and resulting in reduced energy consumption. Each work stage of the loader is identified by matching it to the main pump pressure waveform and actuator pilot pressure waveform. Using a sliding time window method, pressure waveforms from each working stage are subjected to feature extraction. A bidirectional long short-term memory neural network (BILSTM) algorithm is then used to establish an intelligent recognition model. Based on work stage identification, an energy-saving control strategy based on power matching is proposed for the shoveling stage of the loader, and the Grey Wolf optimization (GWO)-PID algorithm is utilized for control parameter tuning. Finally, the effectiveness of the energy-saving control strategy based on work stage identification is verified through experiments. The research results indicate that the BILSTM recognition model outperforms other models with a recognition accuracy of 96.1%. The optimal time window width is 0.6 s, and the proposed energy-saving control strategy achieves a fuel-saving rate of 6.81%. This method provides feasibility for reducing energy consumption in construction machinery and achieving energy-saving and carbon-reduction goals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidirectional long and short-term memory network; consumption reduction; energy saving; energy-saving control strategies; identification of work stages; loader; power matching |
| Index terms: | neural network, experiment, effectiveness, energy consumption, accuracy, window, strategy, energy-saving, consumption |
| Subjects: | energy systems, architectural elements, artificial intelligence, performance management, management, professional development, data collection methods, consumer economics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Quality Management, Information Management, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here