Miao, K; Lou, W; Schonfeld, P and Xiao, Z (2024) Optimal earthmoving-equipment combination considering carbon emissions with an indicator-based multiobjective optimizer. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(1): 04023152, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Reasonable earthmoving-equipment combinations have helped to reduce duration and cost in the construction industry traditionally. However, reducing carbon emissions in earthmoving operations is highly desirable because earthmoving operations involve a large number of heavy equipment, which produce high carbon emissions. It is necessary to study a novel equipment combination optimization model considering decreasing carbon emissions in addition to duration and cost. Hence, a triobjective equipment combination optimization (ECO) model is developed, minimizing carbon emissions as well as project duration and cost. In this model, the excavation and transportation processes of earthwork are regarded as a queuing system, and queuing theory is integrated directly into the model to compute the involved parameters instead of a simulation. On the other hand, for obtaining the optimal solution set of the multiobjective problems with more objectives, a novel two-archive multiobjective particle swarm algorithm is proposed, which updates individuals in archives by not only Pareto domination but also an indicator that can assess solution quality. A real case study demonstrated that the model can efficiently provide a reasonable earthmoving-equipment combination considering the trade-off among carbon emissions, duration, and cost for managers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon emissions; earthmoving operations; equipment combinations; multiobjective particle swarm algorithm |
| Index terms: | case study, carbon emission, earthmoving, construction industry, duration, earthwork, manager, excavation |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, climate science, practitioner, construction methods, construction operations, project controls, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here