Mostofi, F; Tokdemir, O B; Toǧan, V and Arditi, D (2024) Predicting the cost of rework in high-rise buildings using graph convolutional networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(8): 04024085, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
To reduce the risk of unexpected cost of rework (COR), a variety of predictive models have been developed in the construction management literature. However, they primarily focus on prediction accuracy, and rather less attention has been paid to the trustworthiness of prediction models. This increases operational risk and hinders its integration in related decision-making. Aiming to reduce the utilization risk and increase the reliability of COR prediction models, this study exploits the graph convolutional network (GCN) model, which enhances representativeness by accommodating interrelationships among the root causes of nonconformances. The GCN can process a more representative input network that provides COR records while factoring in the shared root causes of nonconformance in the resulting COR. The proposed approach achieved a COR prediction accuracy as high as 85%, which is significantly higher than that of any existing cost prediction model. The demonstrated accuracy and lower risk of the proposed GCN model thus enhance the reliability of the prediction and trust in its outcome, facilitating its integration into developing rework prevention strategies and relevant resource allocation for construction professionals. The study contributes to construction project management by proposing a novel COR prediction model that embodies accuracy, representativeness, and interpretability. Whereas we tailored the GCN model to predict COR with a focus on nonconformance root causes, it is noted that rework costs can also be influenced by other project factors, such as site safety.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction cost of rework prediction; graph convolutional network; high-rise building construction; nonconformance report; representative machine learning |
| Index terms: | integration, prevention, construction cost, construction project management, machine learning, decision-making, resource allocation, strategy, high-rise building, construction professional, rework, accuracy, prediction model, cost prediction |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, project management theory and practice, organizational analysis, professional development, financial and cost management, operations management, management, financial risk, prediction and forecasting, resource management, construction type, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Information Management, Project Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Site Management, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here