Naji, K K; Gunduz, M and Mansour, M M (2024) Development of an integrated hybrid risk assessment system for construction disputes during the preconstruction phase using the Delphi method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024068, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper proposes a hybrid conceptual and performance assessment integrated dispute risk system that enables construction professionals to evaluate, track, and manage construction disputes. It establishes a correlation between dispute-contributing factors and their respective preconstruction stages, facilitating early dispute detection and mitigation before the construction phase. This method can be applied to gauge the effectiveness of the preconstruction phase in relation to its influence on the emergence of disputes. Through an extensive literature review, expert interviews, and the Delphi technique, 48 key risk factors were identified and categorized into four groups. Eighteen experts were selected using purposive sampling, and their survey responses were checked for normality and reliability using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Cronbach's alpha. The Delphi method was employed to reach a consensus among the panelists after two rounds of evaluation, using the nonparametric statistical parameters, such as Kendall's coefficient of concordance and chi-squared. Subsequently, the interrater agreement (IRA) was measured, and the dispute factors were ranked. Based on the ranking results, a novel integrated hybrid system was formulated that synergistically combines a hybrid conceptual and performance assessment framework with a fuzzy logic-structural equation model (SEM). The proposed hybrid system includes two key components: a unique conceptual and performance assessment framework and a hybrid model that combines fuzzy logic and SEM. This combined approach captures uncertainty and ambiguity in assessing dispute risks related to probability and severity, providing a more precise evaluation of disputes in construction projects. Additionally, the introduction of new dispute categories specifically targeting the preconstruction phase proactively deals with potential disputes before the construction begins. This advanced integrated hybrid system can be an effective preconstruction assessment tool for evaluating and managing various dispute factors, enabling project managers to proactively assess, manage, and mitigate construction disputes between project parties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction disputes; cost overrun; Delphi study; fuzzy logic; integrated hybrid system; preconstruction phase; risk assessment; risk management; structural equation model; time overrun |
| Index terms: | Delphi technique, mitigation, construction project, emergence, interview, project party, hybrid system, survey, literature review, risk management, effectiveness, structural equation model, risk factor, risk assessment, construction professional, performance assessment, construction dispute, construction phase, purposive sampling, fuzzy logic, time overrun, project manager, Delphi method, cost overrun, dispute |
| Subjects: | performance management, research methods, production management, financial risk, professional development, project controls, sociology, assessment methods, statistical analysis, systems engineering, environmental hazards, systems and processes, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, dispute resolution, data analysis and analytics, data science, financial and cost management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here