Ning, X; Yang, Y; Liu, C and Han, Y (2024) Construction workers' unsafe behavior contagion under government-contractor dual influence. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(9): 04024111, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Despite efforts to prevent and correct unsafe behavior on construction sites, such behavior persists among construction workers. Much of what makes unsafe behavior so difficult to eradicate is its contagious nature. The contagion pattern of unsafe behavior is not only based on the group characteristics of construction workers but also influenced by government regulatory agencies (GRA) and general contractors (GC). In this study, we established a contagion model of construction workers' unsafe behavior based on group-level factors and the dual influence of GRA and GC and employed evolutionary game theory and epidemic models to explore the contagion patterns and interventions of unsafe behavior. We find that, although the strong and weak regulation strategies by GRA suppress the contagion of unsafe behavior, the strong regulation strategy exhibits a better preventive effect; further, the active management strategies by GC have a dampening effect on the contagion of unsafe behavior and vice versa, enhanced perceived social benefits of GRA prevent unsafe behavior more than enhanced perceived image loss, and a high degree of group identity perception effectively inhibits the contagion of unsafe behavior when construction workers have relatively high levels of safety awareness. By portraying the contagion state of construction workers' unsafe behavior in actual situations, this study provides a theoretical basis for the decision-making of GRA and GC and helps to improve the work efficiency of GRA as well as the safety management level of GC.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction worker; dual influence; epidemic model; evolutionary game theory; unsafe behavior contagion |
| Index terms: | efficiency, management strategy, evolutionary game, construction worker, identity, construction site, strategy, regulatory agency, general contractor, social benefit, unsafe behaviour, safety management, regulation, decision-making |
| Subjects: | work location, practitioner, sociology, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, economic theory, political science, administrative law, performance management, management, theoretical framing, financial risk |
| Topics: | Site Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Governance, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here