Poirier, E A; Pavard, A and De Paula, N (2024) Determining factors influencing BIM adoption: A competency-driven approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(8): 04024080, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Building information modeling (BIM) adoption has received increasing attention over the past two decades due to its potential to revolutionize the built asset industry. Several different characteristics, facilitators, and drivers of BIM adoption have been identified, which has led to the development of BIM adoption frameworks and guidelines. Many of these elements and frameworks have focused on specific organizational-, project-, or industry-level characteristics. Few have taken a competency-based approach to BIM adoption. Thus, this paper aims to empirically evaluate and validate the factors influencing BIM adoption within organizations operating in the built asset industry as understood through the evolution of their BIM competency profiles. The research consists of a mixed-method data collection on a sample set of 368 organizations participating in the Initiative Québécoise pour la Construction 4.0 (IQC 4.0). The research method of analysis is based on a bivariate approach for testing the correlation between the variables concerning the organization's internal characteristics and their BIM competency development level. The findings show that the factors, which include field of activity, BIM experience, size, financial capacity, and geographical location, are correlated to an organization's BIM competency development level; in parallel, an organization's perceived maturity is strongly correlated. The results from this research can be potentially useful to properly guide and structure governmental initiatives supporting competency development for digital transformation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling adoption; competency; digital transformation |
| Index terms: | facilitator, transformation, construction 4.0, building information modelling, testing, built asset, evolution |
| Subjects: | practitioner, business, digital engineering, professional practice, environmental science, information systems, asset management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here