Rizaee, S and Lei, Z (2024) Duration estimation of a heavy industrial scaffolding project: A case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(4): 05024002, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Accurate project duration estimation is crucial for effective scheduling, budgeting, resource allocation, and overall construction management. Leveraging historical data from completed projects is an effective strategy to achieve this. In heavy industrial projects, where scaffolding activities can span from thousands to millions of hours, refining the estimation of scaffolding time is vital during the planning phase. This study undertook the analysis of data from a completed heavy industrial scaffolding project, aiming to propose a methodology and models for predicting future projects durations. The proposed methodology not only aids in improved duration but also contributes to cost estimation, scheduling, and project delivery of similar future endeavors. Commencing with data cleaning and categorizing the data based on activity types, the scatter plots of person-hours versus task weight within each category revealed a linear relationship. Consequently, linear models for each category were developed. Statistical factors such as data size, coefficient of determination, and mean absolute error were then utilized to calculate a score for each model, guiding the model selection process which substituted low score models with a parent category with a higher score. The data analysis and modeling were performed five times to ensure robustness and consistency in the results. On average, the initial models yielded a project duration estimate of only 0.36% higher than the actual duration, while the selected models increased this deviation to 4.14%. The scoring and selection process enhances estimation accuracy while maintaining proximity to actual project durations. This research makes three significant contributions: (1) introducing a categorical linear regression approach for scaffolding activity duration prediction, (2) presenting a novel normalization and scoring method that scores models based on statistical factors, and (3) implementing a practical model selection process to substitute weaker models with stronger ones, ultimately strengthening the reliability of activity and project duration predictions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | strengthening, methodology, cost estimating, data analysis, scheduling, accuracy, budgeting, strategy, scaffolding, cleaning, project delivery, modelling, estimate, duration, case study, resource allocation, estimation, deviation |
| Subjects: | project controls, professional development, structural engineering, management, financial management, maintenance engineering, research methods, data analysis and analytics, resource management, analytical methods, project delivery, financial and cost management, operations research, operations management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Time Control, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here