Autonomous building design for manufacturing and assembly: A systematic review of design application, challenges, and opportunities

Sadoughi, A; Kouhirostami, M; Kouhirostamkolaei, M; Qi, B and Costin, A (2024) Autonomous building design for manufacturing and assembly: A systematic review of design application, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(9): 03124006, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable and affordable construction, paired with labor shortages, requires more efficient tools and methodologies. Industrialized construction (IC) is one solution that has the ability to address construction efficiency by utilizing techniques such as modularization, construction automation, and building information modeling. One particular aspect of IC is Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) since the design phase determines up to 80% of the operating costs. However, DfMA is yet to be implemented in the construction industry due to some challenges in DfMA that inhibit full implementation. The majority of construction manufacturers have to regenerate the construction drawings for manufacturing which add substantial time to the schedule. Delays are caused by the lack of coordination of these components, as well as assemblies' connections, compliance with building codes, and other related policies. Although many scholarly manufacturing and assembly works have studied and reviewed various aspects, techniques, and applications of DfMA, none have looked at the design process, tools and methods, or challenges in design automation. Using a systematic literature review, this study reviews the most recent innovative design responses for manufacturing and assemblies, and tools and methods. The study then analyzes the identified challenges of DfMA automation and processes in the existing literature on the construction industry, such as the lack of autonomous design and construction manufacturing. The literature analysis suggests future studies are required to improve DfMA not only as a technique but as a design strategy, particularly during the design process and prior to the production phase. Finally, future directions are provided to lead the next generation of research to advance building construction. Significantly, the results of this research provide an up-to-date status on autonomous DfMA and contribute to the body of knowledge of IC by synthesizing the state-of-the-art of building design automation and methods for manufacture and assembly.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: body of knowledge, building code, implementation, operating cost, methodology, design phase, building design, efficiency, industrialized construction, design for manufacture and assembly, modularization, building information modelling, design and construction, manufacturer, labour shortage, coordination, systematic literature review, compliance, future study, construction industry, drawing, automation, building construction, design strategy, design process, state of the art
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, design methods, regulatory law, contractual arrangements, economics, architectural design, industry analysis, knowledge management, economic analysis, construction type, technical documentation, information systems, management, practitioner, professional practice, automation and robotics, research design and methodology, manufacturing engineering, building construction, health safety and environment, research methods
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Procurement, Information Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here