Identification of best practices in project bundling for state dots using semistructured interviews

Shrestha, S; Shan, Y and Goodrum, P M (2024) Identification of best practices in project bundling for state dots using semistructured interviews. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024056, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Project bundling is a method used by state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and other public agencies to combine multiple construction projects into a single contract. Project bundling is typically applied when the projects share similarities in terms of type, size, and geographical location. Prior research has demonstrated cost savings and accelerated project delivery times due to this approach. However, little-To-no previous research efforts have particularly focused on developing a comprehensive guidance strategy for project bundling of various transportation projects. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap by identifying the best practices of project bundling that enable state DOTs to implement project bundling more efficiently. To achieve this goal, empirical evidence was gathered through semistructured interviews and follow-up correspondence with 16 representatives from different state DOTs and a local public agency. These interviews gathered insights into the methods and strategies used by different state DOTs to successfully bundle projects. For instance, the study discovered that agencies utilize different bundling strategies (for instance, optional-Tie or mandatory-Tie), as well as bundling approaches (scope-based or location-based). By qualitatively analyzing the success stories and lessons learned from these interviews, the study provides a comprehensive strategy that serves as a guide for state DOTs in navigating the project bundling for different construction projects. The main contribution of the study is the synthesis of the project bunding practices, which allows state DOTs and other transportation agencies to have a holistic approach to implementing project bundling to reap its maximum benefits.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: best practices; bridge construction; highway construction; project bundling; project delivery; state department of transportation
Index terms: agency, bridge construction, lessons learned, evidence, construction project, bundling, strategy, transportation project, interview, project delivery, cost saving, holistic approach, best practice, highway construction, transportation agency
Subjects: transportation engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, infrastructure engineering, professional development, production management, economics, civil engineering, management, project delivery, financial and cost management, business, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods
Topics: Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here