Estimating cost of bridge closure for bridge network rehabilitation priorities

Tran, H; Robert, D; Gunarathna, P and Setunge, S (2024) Estimating cost of bridge closure for bridge network rehabilitation priorities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024071, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Bridge network maintenance and rehabilitation activities are crucial to prevent bridge failure from human-made and natural hazards such as deterioration, overload, collision, fire, flooding, and earthquake. Under a limited budget, understanding the bridge closure cost to social-economic-environmental aspects can help prioritizing bridge network maintenance and rehabilitation in a cost-benefit justifiable manner. In this study, the costing method is applied to calculate social-economic-environmental costs incurred due to detour routes with additional travel time and distance. In addition to the commonly used cost factors of time value cost and vehicle running cost, this study also uses probability theory to calculate the expected consequence costs of delayed rescue services of ambulance, police, and fire-fighting caused by bridge closure. A case study with a bridge network is used to demonstrate the methodology adopted and outcome benefits from study. The results of case study show that the time value cost of vehicle passengers, vehicle running cost, and ambulance delay cost are the major cost contributors. The bridge importance ranking and consequence cost of bridge closure can be used to provide prioritized inspection and repair program for bridge components that have a high ranking under limited budget and provide benefit estimations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge importance ranking; bridge management; case study; consequence cost; detour costs; hazards; probability theory; social-economic-environmental costs
Index terms: estimating, repair, methodology, program, natural hazard, flooding, deterioration, costing, running cost, earthquake, cost factor, inspection, estimation, case study, prioritizing
Subjects: quality assurance, environmental hazards, decision analysis, software systems, maintenance engineering, research methods, accounting and finance, economics, financial and cost management, material degradation and durability, data collection methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Quality Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here