Graphical delay tracking for linear and repetitive schedules

Triana-Granados, K V; Bernard, I R; Merlin, A; Lucko, G and Ballesteros-Pérez, P (2024) Graphical delay tracking for linear and repetitive schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(8): 04024090, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction project delays can stem from a myriad of factors and pose significant challenges for owners and contractors. While numerous methods for analyzing delays exist, the majority are designed for network scheduling, lack contemporaneous tracking (i.e., do not allow for identifying and tracking delays as they occur), and struggle with attributing delays to specific stakeholders. Therefore, this paper introduces a novel graphical approach to monitor delays by comparing as-planned and as-built schedules at the activity level. Distinguished by its contemporaneous nature, the new method allows real-time tracking and quantification of delays. This facilitates identifying their origin and potential causes. Rules for constructing the graphs of various delay scenarios are demonstrated for typical activity combinations. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated via a case study that showcases its practical application. Implementing it is straightforward, and while the method could be applied to network schedules, its relevance lies in linear and repetitive schedules. The cyclic nature of tasks in such schedules underscores the importance of contemporaneous delay tracking to facilitate swift remedial actions and pinpoint liability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: delays; line of balance; linear scheduling; project tracking; repetitive projects
Index terms: liability, repetitive project, linear scheduling, real-time tracking, case study, quantification, network scheduling, construction project, effectiveness, line of balance, owner
Subjects: measurement and scaling, data collection methods, production management, sociology, data management, liability law, operations research, performance management
Topics: Project Management, Time Control, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here