Turkoglu, H; Arditi, D and Polat, G (2024) Augmented time-cost trade-off optimization using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(5): 04024031, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study proposes an optimization model based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) to achieve the objectives of minimizing project duration, project cost, and resource fluctuation while maximizing project quality and schedule flexibility. The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to determine whether the interrelationships between these five objectives affect the outcome of the optimization; (2) to determine whether the presence or absence of resource constraints affects the solution; and (3) to verify that the solution of the PSO-based optimization model coincides with the exact mathematical solution, but faster. An example project was presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed model. The conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) multiple objectives do interact with each other and should be evaluated simultaneously rather than one at a time to reach realistic solutions, (2) resource constraints do affect the solutions obtained, and (3) the proposed model successfully reaches an optimal solution that is extremely close to the exact mathematical solution much faster than the mathematical model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction projects; multiobjective; particle swarm optimization; resource constraints; scheduling; trade-off |
| Index terms: | time-cost trade-off, duration, presence, resource constraint, construction project, project cost, mathematical model, scheduling |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, environmental science, operations management, operations research, production management, economics, quantity surveying, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Risk Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here