Ure, J D; South, A J; Farnsworth, C B; Bown, M and Thompson, N (2024) Enlarging the role of CEM professionals in corporate sustainability: ESG programs and the built environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(8): 04024095, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Corporations develop, own, operate, and direct a majority of all assets in the built environment (BE), and the development and operation of these assets is a significant component of global sustainability. In recent years corporate sustainability action for large companies has trended toward becoming embedded within corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) programs. However, ESG strategies and their impacts are only beginning to be understood by large corporations, with little definition for how to apply, measure, and assess the effectiveness of ESG practices. Every industry sector has some connection to the BE, and construction engineering, and management (CEM) professionals contribute to all phases of the BE life cycle, including development, design, construction, and operations. As such, CEM professionals are vital in developing and implementing sustainability practices specifically for corporations with large footprints in the BE. The purpose of this research was to assess the extent to which the BE is impacted by corporate sustainability practice through ESG programs. The research utilized a grounded theory approach to explore sustainability practices directly associated with the BE from companies within all 11 Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors. It presents a representative model that encapsulates current organizational ESG strategy, through the development of ESG action categories. A total of 24 different ESG action categories are presented and defined. The research further identifies those ESG actions commonly applied by large corporations and how these actions differ by GICS sector. This research indicates that over half of corporate ESG actions are related to the BE. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates the necessary role that CEM professionals should play in influencing sustainability practice through ESG strategy and action within the BE.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; environmental, social, and governance; sustainability |
| Index terms: | program, strategy, industry sector, effectiveness, built environment, construction engineering, grounded theory, life cycle, becoming, governance |
| Subjects: | philosophical process, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, software systems, engineering methods, performance management, management, theoretical framing, value management, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Governance, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here