Wu, J; Ye, Y and Du, J (2024) Autonomous drones in urban navigation: Autoencoder learning fusion for aerodynamics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024067, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Drones are becoming indispensable in emergency search and rescue (SAR), particularly in intricate urban areas where rapid and accurate response is crucial. This study addresses the pressing need for enhancing drone navigation in such complex, dynamic urban environments, where obstacles like building layouts and varying wind conditions create unique challenges. Particularly, the need for adapting drone autonomous navigation in correspondence with dynamic wind conditions in urban settings is emphasized because it is important for drones to avoid loss of control or crashes during SAR. This paper introduces a pioneering method integrating multiobjective reinforcement learning (MORL) with a convolutional autoencoder to train autonomous drones in comprehending and reacting to aerodynamic features in urban SAR. MORL enables the drone to optimize multiple goals, whereas the convolutional autoencoder generates synthetic wind simulations with a substantially lower computation cost compared to traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. A unique data transfer structure is also proposed, which fosters a seamless integration of perception and decision-making between machine learning (ML) and reinforcement learning (RL) components. This approach uses imagery data, specific to building layouts, allowing the drone to autonomously formulate policies, prioritize navigation decisions, optimize paths, and mitigate the impact of wind, all while negating the necessity for conventional aerodynamic force sensors. The method was validated with a model of New York City, offering substantial implications for enhancing automation algorithms in urban SAR. This innovation enables the possibility of more efficient, precise, and timely drone SAR operations within intricate urban landscapes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | autonomous drones; convolutional autoencoder; reinforcement learning; search and rescue; wind simulation |
| Index terms: | urban environment, machine learning, computation, integration, urban area, decision-making, New York, drone, automation, computational fluid dynamics, reinforcement, aerodynamic, becoming |
| Subjects: | philosophical process, organizational analysis, decision analysis, Geography, automation and robotics, factor and component analysis, urban form and morphology, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, building materials, urban sustainability, computational methods |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here