Xiang, Q; Liu, Y; Goh, Y M; Ye, G and Safiena, S (2024) Investigating the impact of hazard perception failure on construction workers' unsafe behavior: An eye-tracking and thinking-aloud approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7): 04024066, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Understanding the antecedents of construction workers' unsafe behavior is significant for developing effective interventions. Many studies have suggested that hazard perception failure influences workers' unsafe behavior. However, the relationship between hazard perception failure and workers' unsafe behavior remains anecdotal and has yet to be empirically examined. Furthermore, the mechanism of hazard perception failure affecting workers' unsafe behavior is also unclear. To fill these gaps, this study breaks down hazard perception failure into attention failure, hazard recognition failure, and risk perception failure, and examines how these three types of hazard perception failure interact to influence workers' unsafe behavior. Laboratory experiments combining eye-tracking and thinking-aloud were conducted to collect data. And then, regression analysis was employed to test the research hypotheses. The results demonstrated that: (1) attention failure (β = 0.292), hazard recognition failure (β = 0.818), and risk perception failure (β = 0.388) have a significant positive effect on workers' unsafe behavior; (2) attention failure has a significant positive effect on hazard recognition failure (β = 0.321) and risk perception failure (β = 0.109), and hazard recognition failure has a significant positive effect on risk perception failure (β = 0.392); and (3) attention failure has an indirect effect on workers' unsafe behavior through hazard recognition failure (0.260) and risk perception failure (0.040). The primary contributions of this study include: (1) providing empirical evidence to support the relationship between hazard perception failure and workers' unsafe behavior by validating the significant positive effects of the three types of hazard perception failure on workers' unsafe behavior; and (2) providing insights into the mechanism of hazard perception failure affecting workers' unsafe behavior by revealing how the three types of hazard perception failure interact to influence workers' unsafe behavior.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | attention failure; construction worker; hazard perception failure; hazard recognition failure; risk perception failure; unsafe behavior |
| Index terms: | laboratory, unsafe behaviour, risk perception, experiment, evidence, indirect effect, construction worker, regression analysis |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, statistical analysis, research management, financial risk, analytical methods, practitioner, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here