Yang, Z and Lu, W (2024) Lean modular integrated construction production phase planning under uncertainties: A big data-driven optimization approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(6): 04024048, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Phase planning is one of the most important components of lean-based production planning that provides basic guidelines for the entire production process. In modular integrated construction (MiC) projects, the complicated and drawn-out features of the manufacturing or production process pose difficulties for informed phase planning decisions under uncertainties. However, owing to the nascent nature of MiC, traditional approaches have little prior knowledge of the uncertainties. This research aimed to address this problem by proposing a data-driven optimization method based on a set of valuable historical production data to hedge against uncertainties during production. A real-life case study was then conducted to validate this optimization approach. The planning solution, including the (1) critical production path, (2) detailed production schedules, and (3) simulated production process, balances production schedules and uncertainties to ensure feasible and robust phase planning. This optimization method can make full use of historical production data rather than approximations of the probability distributions to handle uncertainties in the phase planning process. This research provides an innovative and robust solution for MiC production managers to efficiently conduct phase planning under uncertainties. It enriches the literature on phase planning and contributes to lean MiC manufacturing. The biggest novelty of this research is to open up a window for researchers and practitioners to look into MiC production in factories, which are traditionally like a "black box"unknown to us.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data-driven optimization; decision-making under uncertainties; lean construction; modular integrated construction; production phase planning; production process optimization |
| Index terms: | practitioner, window, production process, probability distribution, manager, production planning, lean construction, case study, construction production, big data, planning process, decision-making |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, practitioner, project controls, information systems, decision analysis, data collection methods, project delivery, building construction, architectural elements, statistical analysis, operations management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Time Control, Site Management, Risk Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here