Zhong, B; Shen, L; Pan, X; Zhong, X and He, W (2024) Dispute classification and analysis: Deep learning-based text mining for construction contract management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(1): 04023151, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Disputes routinely arise in construction projects and significantly affect costs and scheduling. Learning from previous disputes is pivotal for construction contract management. This research focuses on extracting valuable information from government-issued statute that is involved in construction contract dispute, which is underexplored but useful for better construction contract management. The research presented in this study explores and evaluates five typical shallow learning models and four deep learning models for the multilabel text classification task that provide the ability to analyze dispute cases with statute outcomes automatically. Furthermore, model optimizations in some control variables (i.e., model grid search) are conducted to provide constructive model selection suggestions in practical text mining applications. Results show that the text convolution neural network model with 256 filter number and [1,2,3,4] filter size is a suitable backbone architecture for classifying construction dispute cases, which produced the best performance with the P@1(%), P@3(%), P@5(%), NDCG@1(%), NDCG@3(%), and NDCG@5(%) by 65.99, 54.60, 44.32, 65.99, 62.41, and 65.09. In conclusion, the contributions of this research mainly cover the following: (1) exploring and evaluating several multilabel classification models in construction dispute classification tasks and making further model optimizations and (2) the automatic generation of government-issued statutes enabling contract administrators to understand and evaluate the worth of their claims prior to taking it to litigation and therefore put in place strategies to reduce and resolve dispute in construction contract management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction contract management; contract dispute; legal knowledge; multilabel text classification; statute outcomes; text mining |
| Index terms: | statute, construction project, contract administrator, convolution, scheduling, strategy, neural network, mining, construction contract, construction dispute, dispute, litigation, deep learning |
| Subjects: | production management, management, geotechnical engineering, practitioner, dispute resolution, contract type, legal systems, data science, artificial intelligence, operations research |
| Topics: | Time Control, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here