Adshead, J (2009) An integrated approach to water protection and management: The European Union model. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(3), pp. 234-243. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive. It seeks first to determine whether its provisions align with modern thinking on integrated river basin management and second to assess the degree to which it has the potential to achieve legislative and interagency integration throughout the Union. Design/methodology/approach – This is a desktop study. The paper draws upon theories and definitions of integrated river basin management and internal integration in existing literature and then proceeds to examine the provisions of the Water Framework Directive in the light of the models identified. Findings – The framework for river basin management in the Water Framework Directive does not fully match the modern approach to integrated river basin management. The directive is limited by its primary focus upon the single medium of water, and its consequent failure to fully address wider land use planning issues. It, therefore, also fails to achieve integration between all relevant legislative instruments. It provides a framework for stakeholder involvement that could potentially serve the goal of interagency integration. However, due to the high level of discretion in the hands of member states, there is likely to be a substantial divergence of practice across the EU. Originality/value – In assessing the Water Framework Directive against modern notions of river basin management and the directive's stated integrative aspirations, the paper informs implementation and practice in member states.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | European directives; European union; water industry |
| Index terms: | implementation, land use planning, European Union, methodology, integration, agency, stakeholder involvement, integrated approach |
| Subjects: | urban design, physical geography and landforms, research methods, organizational analysis, sociology, contractual arrangements, participation process |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here