Abdi, A; Lind, H and Birgisson, B (2013) Payment mechanisms for winter road maintenance services. Construction Economics and Building, 13(4), pp. 18-31. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
In countries with severe winters, a major portion of the annual budget for road maintenance is allocated to winter road maintenance. Thus it is important to identify an appropriate basis for the remuneration of the entrepreneurs who carry out the maintenance tasks, one that minimises or eliminates disputes and that satisfies both client organisations and contractors. The objective of this study is to investigate and evaluate the payment models applied in Sweden for winter road maintenance services and suggest possible improvements. Inadequate reimbursement models lead either to unnecessary cost overruns that affect the client's annual budget or cause cash flow problems for the contractor, which can result in safety issues. To solve the problems associated with paying for just-in-time road maintenance, cold region countries such as Sweden have developed various remuneration models, including some based on what is known as the Weather Index. The study uses a domestic questionnaire survey, analysis of a number of current contract documents, a series of meetings with project managers followed by an international benchmarking investigation. The study identified four winter maintenance remuneration models of which one is based on weather data. The study reveals that the payment model based on weather data statistics is applied only to roads with higher traffic flow and generates the most uncertainty about costs. Possible improvements should include more reliable weather data obtained from weather stations and bonuses related to customer satisfaction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contract; payment mechanism; remuneration models; road maintenance; winter maintenance services |
| Index terms: | winter, cash flow, contract document, just-in-time, questionnaire, investigation, traffic flow, customer satisfaction, project manager, statistics, cost overrun, safety issue, dispute, benchmarking, weather, payment mechanism, survey, Sweden, client organization |
| Subjects: | client relations, air quality, mathematical modelling, performance measurement, profession, financial management, data collection methods, dispute resolution, financial risk, climate science, service delivery, contractual condition, Geography, lean logistics, economic analysis, transportation engineering, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here