Christudason, A (2009) Property rights: Achieving a fine balance in collective sales of strata developments in Singapore. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(1), pp. 26-41. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – In the light of the property relativist theory, the purpose of this paper is to review the impact of radical amendments to strata legislation in Singapore in 1999 which, together with changes to the planning framework, stimulated privatesector led redevelopment in Singapore. This was achieved through the introduction of majority rule (rather than unanimity) in collective sales (CS) of strata developments. The paper also addresses the issue of how a balance can be achieved between the property rights of majority and minority strata owners. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses casestudies, planning provisions, and data on property transactions to analyse the effectiveness of the measures taken to address Singapore's landscarcity problem. Legal terms and their significance are addressed in a manner that will also be comprehensible to a nonlegally trained readership. Findings – The cases demonstrate attempts by the authorities to clarify, and to provide a better balance to, the position of those whose property rights had been sacrificed at the altar of redevelopment and urban rejuvenation in Singapore. Nevertheless, there still remain numerous pockets of resistance to CS. These still need to be addressed to reassure the minority in the context of the property relativist theory. Research limitations/implications – The continued groundswell of protests against collective sale means that there are further issues that need to be addressed to mitigate the plight of the minority. The response of parliament has been reactive, but it remains to be seen whether the minority's concerns have been adequately addressed. Originality/value – The analysis of the cases, whose decisions turned on the authorities' interpretation of the controversial legislation, is instructive. These can provide valuable pointers for policy makers in other jurisdictions contemplating urban rejuvenation. The twin issues that are dealt with relate to how privatesector redevelopment can be incentivised through planning measures, without riding roughshod over individuals' private property rights.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | democracy; laws and legislation; property rights; redevelopment; Singapore |
| Index terms: | minority, effectiveness, land, Singapore, owner, methodology, property rights, redevelopment, legislation, jurisdiction, private property |
| Subjects: | legal systems, real estate economics, Geography, performance management, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Ethics, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here