Morgan, J (2009) Housing and security in England and Wales: Casualisation revisited. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(1), pp. 42-58. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use the notion of “casualisation” in an employment context to reflect on similar developments in England and Wales since 1996 which have combined to undermine security of tenure in the private and social rented sectors and exposed the vulnerability of owner occupiers who default on mortgage repayments. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on observations made by commentators in housing and social policy as well as official papers, statutes and cases. Findings – The problems posed for the longterm security of residential occupiers are highlighted and are shown to result from a combination of factors including the deregulation of the private rented sector, the dependency of housing association on their rental streams, governmental preoccupation with antisocial behaviour in social housing and the principle that mortgage lenders have the right to possession of the mortgaged property. Originality/value – The notion of casualisation is used as an analytical tool to assess changes in law and policy, and to suggest possibilities for reform.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | England; housing; legislation; mortgage default; Wales |
| Index terms: | deregulation, private rented sector, social housing, tenure, England, owner, employment, mortgage, social behaviour, methodology, stream, statute, vulnerability, Wales, housing association, housing, legislation, default |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, institutional client, economic analysis, legal systems, construction type, dispute resolution, sociology, housing and residential development, behavioral psychology, environmental hazards, regulatory law, industry analysis, research methods, management, water management, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here