Building control systems of European Union countries: A comparison of tasks and responsibilities

Branco Pedro, J; Meijer, F and Visscher, H (2010) Building control systems of European Union countries: A comparison of tasks and responsibilities. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 2(1), pp. 45-59. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the tasks and responsibilities of public and private parties in the building control systems of the 27 European Union (EU) countries. Design/methodology/approach – To gather the necessary information, a questionnaire on building regulatory systems was distributed to experts in each country, and the major legal documents in each jurisdiction were reviewed. The information was organized into thematic tables that describe all the countries studied. The themes within the tables are: regulatory framework, application, plan approval, site inspection, completion, and supervision. Findings – The paper finds that there are many similarities between the building control systems of the various EU countries. Public parties in all countries set the regulatory framework, check planning applications, issue building permits, conduct final inspections, grant completion certificates, and supervise the operation of the system. The main difference between them concerns the nature of the involvement of private parties in checking technical requirements, and in site inspections. Three basic types of building control systems are identified: public, mixed, and dual. The majority of the countries have mixed systems. Although several variations are found among the mixed systems, the most common situation is for public parties to check the technical requirements and private parties to be involved in site inspections. Originality/value – The analysis provides a global picture of the building control systems of all EU countries. The results can be useful for situating the systems of each country within the European panorama, assessing the main trends and developments and guiding strategic choices on possible improvements in each country.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; control systems; European union
Index terms: inspection, European Union, final inspection, supervision, panorama, jurisdiction, regulatory system, approval, building control, questionnaire, control system, documents, methodology, variation
Subjects: legal systems, visualization, control systems, project completion, contractual role, data collection methods, political science, quality assurance, professional development, contractual condition, health safety and environment, monitoring and control, research methods, physical geography and landforms
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here