Anti-social behaviour law and policy in the United Kingdom: Assessing the impact of enforcement action in the management of social housing

Hoffman, S; Mackie, P K and Pritchard, J (2010) Anti-social behaviour law and policy in the United Kingdom: Assessing the impact of enforcement action in the management of social housing. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 2(1), pp. 26-44. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of enforcement action on individuals and families living in social housing as a mode of intervention for dealing with antisocial behaviour. Design/methodology/approach – Relevant housing legislation and policy documents are reviewed. The paper then draws on empirical data from Shelter Cymru's case file records of households in social housing who have been subject to enforcement action following an allegation of antisocial behaviour. Evidence obtained from other studies on housing intervention projects is used to contrast the position of the households studied with those in similar situations who have been provided with support as an alternative to enforcement action. Findings – The legislative framework favours enforcement as a means of dealing with antisocial behaviour. A number of remedies utilise the management role of social landlords, and the framework of housing tenure, to introduce the concept of “conditionality” into housing entitlement. This approach to the management of antisocial behaviour compounds the social disadvantage of already vulnerable households by undermining longterm security of tenure and thereby increasing the risk of homelessness and social exclusion. These outcomes contrast with those from studies of similar households in receipt of support within housing intervention projects which have been shown to deliver reductions in antisocial behaviour and sustainable outcomes for families, communities, and landlords. Social implications – The findings provide important lessons for the future direction of antisocial behaviour policy throughout the UK and beyond. In the context of devolved polity in the UK the paper argues for the Welsh Assembly Government to take a lead in developing policies and legal responses which recognize the housing rights of marginalised groups, and for the introduction of support into social housing to counter the trend toward punitive treatment of social tenants as a response to antisocial behaviour. Originality/value – The unique nature of the empirical data set from Shelter Cymru's case file records provides an important insight into the social impact of antisocial behaviour law and policy on some of the most vulnerable members of society.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: disadvantaged groups; housing; law enforcement; laws and legislation; social deviance; Wales
Index terms: tenure, social impact, enforcement, social housing, anti-social behaviour, household, landlord, housing, Wales, evidence, documents, methodology, social behaviour, United Kingdom, tenant, society, legislation
Subjects: construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, real estate economics, legal systems, research methods, professional development, Geography, health safety and environment, sociology, demography, housing and residential development, behavioral psychology, communities and social development
Topics: Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here