A general duty to co-operate in construction contracts? An international review

Klimas, E (2011) A general duty to co-operate in construction contracts? An international review. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 3(1), pp. 83-96. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the substance of any general duty to co-operate that might exist in relation to construction contracts. It also explores the potential impact that a duty to co-operate might have on ensuring the smooth operation and absence of disputes within construction projects. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis is based on a number of widely accepted international documents. Reference is also made to an edition of the Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils Red Book and to several jurisdictions of common law and continental law systems. Findings – The duty to co-operate permeates the law of contract and is related to the principles of good faith and fair dealing. In common law countries, the duty can take the form of implied terms within the contract. A greater level of awareness of this duty by the parties to construction contracts would minimise disputes and better ensure that the parties achieved their shared objectives. Originality/value – Because different jurisdictions take a variety of approaches towards the areas of law discussed, the paper's use of comparative analysis of the selected documents provides particular insights into the existence of a general duty to co-operate which will assist the future development of the law in this area.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: comparative law; construction contracts; duty to co-operate; good faith; implied terms
Index terms: dispute, good faith, construction contract, comparative analysis, jurisdiction, duty, documents, methodology, construction project
Subjects: contract type, contractual role, dispute resolution, data analysis and analytics, legal systems, research methods, professional development, production management, professional ethics
Topics: Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Contract Administration, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here