Sidoli Del Ceno, J (2011) An investigation into lawyer attitudes towards the use of mediation in commercial property disputes in England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 3(2), pp. 182-198. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – The paper seeks to examine empirically the attitudes of English lawyers towards mediation in commercial landlord and tenant disputes. Despite much support from numerous sources there has been very little actual take-up in this sector. It is premised that the future growth of mediation in commercial property disputes is hindered by the negative or sceptical perspectives held by some lawyers towards mediation. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on data from questionnaires and a series of qualitative interviews with a variety of landlord and tenant lawyers combined with a thorough examination of existing literature. Findings – Many lawyers were not keen to recommend the use of mediation. This was partly because of unfamiliarity as well as concerns that mediation is not a genuine legal process and that consequently it lacked status. Legal culture was identified as a problem here. Lawyers also felt that mediation was inappropriate in many cases. Education was suggested as having an important role in changing expectations, providing skills and raising awareness. Research limitations/implications – The qualitative data are based on a relatively small sample of lawyers active within the UK commercial property sector. Nevertheless, a wide cross-section of practitioners was chosen. Originality/value – The paper provides original data on the attitudes and perspectives of lawyers active in commercial property disputes. This is an area that has yet to receive sustained attention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative dispute resolution; commercial property; dispute resolutions; lawyers; legal culture; legal education; mediation; professional practice; property law |
| Index terms: | lawyer, tenant, mediation, interview, professional practice, property law, alternative dispute resolution, Wales, questionnaire, practitioner, methodology, commercial property, dispute, landlord, England, resolution, investigation, legal education |
| Subjects: | contract management, professional development, Geography, research methods, sociology, educational institutions, conflict resolution, practitioner, dispute resolution, construction type, profession, data collection methods, property law |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Education, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here