Extensions of time and liquidated damages in construction contracts in England and Wales

Brawn, D (2012) Extensions of time and liquidated damages in construction contracts in England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 75-90. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between extensions of time and payment of liquidated damages under construction contracts in English law. This paper sets out the law relating to granting extensions of time and liquidated damages and examines the effect of one upon the other. The JCT form of contract is used as an example, although it is submitted that the position is the same under other forms of contract. Case law is examined to illuminate the judicial approach and highlight inconsistencies, and consideration is given to the position in other jurisdictions. This paper examines the effect of delaying events in particular circumstances, including where time is “at large”, sectional completion, partial possession, set-off of liquidated damages and liquidated damages after termination of the contract. Particular attention is paid to concurrent and sequential delays; where both parties are at fault, it may be appropriate to deny the employer any entitlement to liquidated damages and deny the contractor any entitlement to loss and expense. An understanding of the effect that delaying events have upon the contractor's right to an extension of time and the employer's entitlement to liquidated damages is critical for successful project completion. This relationship is not always straightforward and judicial approach is not always consistent. Clarification is required as to the effect of sequential delays. This paper is of value to researchers and practitioners in establishing the legal position in an area that is often complex and obscure.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concurrency; construction contracts; contracts; delay; England; law; liquidated damages; Wales
Index terms: construction contract, Wales, JCT, case law, form of contract, liquidated damages, practitioner, England, jurisdiction
Subjects: practitioner, contractual remedy, Geography, contract type, contractual arrangements, standard forms of contract, legal systems
Topics: Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Procurement, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here