Del Ceno, J S (2012) Selective licensing and resident satisfaction in social housing: A UK case study. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(2), pp. 126-139. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine empirically the effects of selective licensing on an area of social depravation. The paper consciously focuses solely on the views and perspectives of the residents as opposed to that of the landlord or housing professional.; Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a series of structured qualitative interviews with a statistically significant percentage of residents in the given area.; Findings – The selective licence has had some limited but positive effects on the well-being of the residents. Standards of property management and perceptions of anti-social behaviour had also improved to a degree. It was clear, however, that many residents could not distinguish the selective licensing process from more generic local authority intervention. Many residents reported an increase in their “self-esteem” due to the interventions of the local authority, however labelled.; Originality/value – The paper provides original data on the attitudes and perspectives of residents in an area of selective licensing. This is an area of current interest that has yet to receive sustained attention. Whilst centred on legislation in England and Wales its findings and discussion are relevant in other jurisdictions facing similar issues.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | housing; Housing Act 2004; privately rented sector; property management; selective licensing; social housing; tenant self-esteem; UK |
| Index terms: | anti-social behaviour, Housing Act 2004, social housing, property management, case study, landlord, satisfaction, England, well-being, methodology, housing, Wales, interview, legislation, jurisdiction, tenant, licensing, local authority, licence |
| Subjects: | Geography, contract structure, research methods, housing and residential development, sociology, practitioner, knowledge transfer, data collection methods, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, statutes, legal systems, project delivery, real estate economics |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here