Hughes, C and Crosby, N (2012) The challenge of self-regulation in commercial property leasing: A study of lease codes in the UK. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 23-44. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
UK Government policy to address perceived market failure in commercial property leasing has largely been pursued through industry self-regulation. Yet, it is proving difficult to assess whether self-regulation on leasing has been a “success”, or even to determine how to evaluate this. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for this and a clearer understanding of self-regulation in commercial leasing. A literature review suggests key criteria to explain the (in)effectiveness of self-regulation. UK lease codes are analysed in the light of this literature, drawing on previous research carried out by the authors on the operation of these codes. Lease codes appear to be failing as an effective system of self-regulation. While there are influential market actors championing them, the fragmentation of the leasing process lessens this influence. The structures are not there to ensure implementation, monitor compliance and record views of affected stakeholders. This work adds to the literature on self-regulation in general, and provides an insight into its operation in a previously unexplored industry. Research is needed into the experience of other countries in regulating the property industry by voluntary means. There are institutional limitations to self-regulation within the property industry. This has implications for policy makers in considering the advantages and limitation of using a voluntary solution to achieve policy aims within the commercial leasing market. This paper provides a first step in considering the lease codes in the wider context of industry self-regulation and is relevant to policy makers and industry bodies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | code of practice; commercial property; commercial property lease; government policy; industry self-regulation; leasing; market failure; UK |
| Index terms: | implementation, commercial property, drawing, literature review, government policy, leasing, compliance, lease, market failure, fragmentation, self-regulation, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, economic analysis, performance management, contractual arrangements, health safety and environment, public policy, behavioral psychology, construction type, land economics, business, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Procurement, Governance, Design Practice, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here