Leshinsky, R (2012) Use of planning agreements to support sustainability and environmental preservation: A case study from Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(2), pp. 157-172. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – Sustainable values and implementation tools are now more widely included in Australian land use planning and development. Planning agreements are one instrument by which environmental values and preservation can be made more enduring, particularly as planning agreements run with the land. Little has been said about these agreements and the purpose of this paper is to strive to add to the body of knowledge in this area. The aim of this paper is to introduce a contextual framework for planning agreements, drawing on collaborative planning theory and practice. It also demonstrates how planning agreements can been used as a tool to preserve environmental values and principles generally, and more particularly the rich flora and fauna in the surrounding housing estate adjacent to the Royal Botanical Gardens in Cranbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Design/methodology/approach – The paper relies on a case study from the municipality of Casey located in the state of Victoria and introduces measures taken, via planning agreements between the municipality and estate developers, to preserve green values and the flora and fauna located in the surrounds of the Royal Botanical Gardens in Cranbourne.; Findings – The case study suggests that, whilst the planning agreements may have established excellent procedure and practice to preserve the flora and fauna at the botanic gardens and in its surrounds, the effectiveness of the planning agreements as an environmental preservation tool has limitations. This may be due to the lack of resources for more effective information dissemination and enforcement. Ultimately, it may have to be left to the goodwill of residents to ensure environmental protection of the botanic gardens and its surrounds is maintained.; Research limitations/implications – As the housing estate is still a young development, the case study is an exploratory approach. This leaves open the opportunity for further data to be gathered from estate residents into the effectiveness of the preservation and enforcement of the green values and principles raised in the planning agreements. There is also the opportunity to take the study further to ascertain longitudinally, how respectful original and subsequent owners are of the green values planted in the planning agreements.; Originality/value – The analysis of the case study is instructive, particularly as there is a dearth of literature on how effective planning law agreements are as an environmental preservation and sustainability tool.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; environmental preservation; environmental regulations; planning agreements; sustainability |
| Index terms: | case study, land use planning, Australia, Victoria, owner, information dissemination, effectiveness, agreements, enforcement, land, environmental regulation, implementation, housing estate, environmental protection, collaborative planning, drawing, methodology, municipality, planning law, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | urban design, Geography, health safety and environment, performance management, research methods, economic development, environmental engineering, administrative law, sociology, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, regions and continents, planning law, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, technical documentation, real estate economics, urban planning, contract formation |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Governance, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here