Lindqvist, S (2012) The concept of transparency in the European union's residential housing market: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(2), pp. 99-115. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical framework for the subsequent analysis of the European Union internal market's concept of transparency in residential real estate transactions. Specifically, it seeks to identify the essential factors that should be addressed within any such analysis. The study is based on a review of the literature on the general concept of transparency, and on other related aspects. Based on this study, five dimensions of transparency are identified, namely transparency in transaction procedure, legal information, financing, taxation and transaction costs. The essential points are that an increase in cross-border transactions increases demand for easy access to information held in other countries. The studied literature focuses on the coordination of legal systems, making systems more uniform and legally secured, and on broadening of the mortgage market. The study highlights the complexities involved in achieving transparency, as well as the length of time that this will take to achieve in practice. The paper identifies different dimensions of transparency in residential real estate transactions. There is little prior research in the area which focuses specifically on residential transactions. The study therefore draws upon work in other areas, including financial markets and taxation, and places this within a residential housing context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | European union; housing; property transaction real estate; real; real estate; residential housing market; transparency |
| Index terms: | housing, financing, complexity, residential housing, transaction cost, markets, dimension, taxation, coordination, transparency, access to information, real estate, European Union, mortgage |
| Subjects: | construction type, economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, real estate economics, policy economics, social equity, professional development, management, physical geography and landforms, financial analysis, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Ethics, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Regulations & Compliance, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here