Palmer, K (2012) Local authority liability in New Zealand for defective homes. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(3), pp. 203-216. ISSN 17561469
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess the legal liability of local authorities in New Zealand for the issue of building consents and inspection, in respect of domestic homes where the property proves to be faulty. A local authority may be liable for economic loss. The duty of care extends to the owners of multi-unit dwellings, but not commercial buildings. A ten year longstop for claims from council approvals applies. Problems with leaky homes have given rise to a substantial number of claims. A government response has been to provide a mediation service, and to assume liability for a percentage of repair costs. Design/methodology/approach: The history of liability of local authorities for negligence in respect of building approvals is assessed, through examination of the statute law and the common law principles. Findings: The findings of liability of local authorities in New Zealand is compared to the legal position in the UK. Conclusions are drawn as to legal and practical outcomes. Originality/value: Changes under the law have occurred within the last year and the study is original in assessing the legal position and future outcomes. The liability for leaky homes is a major issue in the country.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; laws; local authority consents; mediation; negligence; New Zealand; UK |
| Index terms: | negligence, local authority, mediation, liability, approval, duty, history, repair, statute, methodology, commercial building, inspection, owner, New Zealand |
| Subjects: | legal systems, architectural and construction history, dispute resolution, contractual role, construction type, liability law, quality assurance, sociology, Geography, research methods, maintenance engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here