Revisiting the ideologies of planning law: Private property, public interest and public participation in the legal framework of England and Wales

Adshead, J (2014) Revisiting the ideologies of planning law: Private property, public interest and public participation in the legal framework of England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 6(1-2), pp. 174-193. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the research is to examine the legal ideologies of planning law proposed by Patrick McAuslan in 1980 and their operation in one key aspect of modern-day planning law in England and Wales in order to assess the balance between these ideologies today. Design/methodology/approach: In order to achieve this, the philosophical and theoretical foundations of the respective legal ideologies are revisited. The approach that follows is a mixed doctrinal and socio-legal one. The content of the law in certain key areas is established and then analysed against the framework of McAuslan's ideologies in order to establish the social context balance of the law. Findings: The paper concludes that, despite much change in law and policy, the balance between the three competing ideologies in the area of development control in the planning regime of England and Wales remains similar to that in 1980. Research limitations/implications: For publication as a research paper, the scope of the examination was necessarily restricted. Certain areas scrutinised by McAuslan are of less relevance today, but, nonetheless, there is clearly scope to revisit some of the other aspects of planning law considered in 1980 and, indeed, to expand the scope of analysis to other areas of environmental law. Originality/value: The paper takes a framework of legal ideologies that was proposed over 30 years ago and applies it to elements of the modern-day planning regime. The paper will be of value to both legal academics and those in the town planning discipline.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: legal ideologies; planning law; private interest; public interest; public participation
Index terms: public interest, England, foundations, town planning, private property, research paper, publication, planning law, Wales, public participation, methodology
Subjects: participation process, planning law, real estate economics, research dissemination and communication, political science, Geography, urban design, structural engineering, research methods
Topics: Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here