Kelly, A H (2014) Amenity enhancement and biodiversity conservation in Australian suburbia: Moving towards maintaining indigenous plants on private residential land. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 6(1-2), pp. 91-105. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to critically explore the historical background and current approach of the most common statutory instrument to maintain green landscapes in private residential gardens in cities and townships in suburban New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Design/methodology/approach: The narrative presents a transdisciplinary study. While its emphasis is on law and town planning, it also encompasses local government and legal history while touching upon environmental management and ecological science. This panoply of areas reflects the sheer complexity of the topic. While the presentation is initially descriptive, it moves on to a critique of the NSW Government's recent statutory approach. Findings: The paper demands that further attention must be paid to improving the design and architecture of statutory plans and underlying policies to not only improve urban biodiversity but also retain, as far as practicable, the visual beauty of the suburban landscape. This means reliance on local government to devise their own acceptable approaches. Flexibility rather than rigidity is warranted. Originality/value: The amount of scholarly material on this topic is relatively rare. The majority of information relies on excellent on-ground research and experience on the part of local experts, namely council employees and consultants. Academic and practical material must be drawn together to improve biodiversity conservation at both the local and regional spheres.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | amenity; Australia; biodiversity conservation; local government; New South Wales; preservation of trees or vegetation; tree preservation orders |
| Index terms: | conservation, environmental management, land, urban biodiversity, town planning, critique, Australia, biodiversity, complexity, history, New South Wales, methodology, narrative, science, local government |
| Subjects: | administrative law, systems engineering, Geography, qualitative and interpretive research, urban design, sustainability assessment, biodiversity, research methods, environmental science, architectural and construction history, environmental policy, real estate economics, specialized education, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Education, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here