Common law environmental protection: The future of private nuisance, Part I

Palmer, R C (2014) Common law environmental protection: The future of private nuisance, Part I. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 6(1-2), pp. 21-42. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to assess the role of private nuisance as a common law tool for environmental protection, independent of the wider regulatory controls. It evaluates specific areas of the tort that are theoretically unresolved in order to ascertain the potential future role it may play before highlighting the capacity for injunctions to coerce restorative environmental justice. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is predominately a classic doctrinal article as it is principally library-based analysing both primary sources (that both pre- and post-date the modern law reporting system) and secondary sources whilst engaging in leading academic commentary. Findings: Nuisance developed to a point in the nineteenth century where a "theory of nuisance" emerged, which did not tolerate injury to health or the property of another. Recent judicial activity has visibly adulterated that theory: this article casts doubts on juridical restrictions regarding health and property suggesting they may not withstand the scrutiny of the Supreme Court if, and when, they are tested. Originality/value: This paper recognises that nuisance law has a positive future in environmental protection provided that the courts are willing to embrace the historical paradigm which has served the common law in this field broadly well for hundreds of years.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical theory; environmental protection; legal history; private nuisance
Index terms: paradigm, history, nuisance, methodology, justice, injury, environmental protection
Subjects: research methods, education and knowledge transfer, environmental engineering, regulatory law, health conditions and diseases, architectural and construction history, legal systems
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Sustainability, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here