Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: The opinion of professional managing agents

Ploeger, H and Groetelaers, D (2014) Managing multi-owned, mixed-use developments in the Netherlands: The opinion of professional managing agents. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 6(3), pp. 271-285. ISSN 1756-1450

Abstract

Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in The Netherlands. Design/methodology/approach – We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors. Findings – The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey. Originality/value – Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of “apartment ownership” works. This makes them a very useful source of information.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Netherlands; management; legal design; mixed-use; multi-owned developments; professional management agencies
Index terms: ownership, case law, design and development, legal design, owner, professional management agency, practitioner, methodology, agent, manager, multi-owned development, survey, Netherlands, drawing
Subjects: Geography, design process, economics, research methods, sociology, practitioner, construction type, data collection methods, organization, legal systems, technical documentation
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here