Crossley, B J (2015) Inter-organisational relationship trust repair: A ranked Delphi study with UK professionals. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7(3), pp. 195-213. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide practical knowledge on how to repair trust within inter-organisational relationships (IORs), and to compare that knowledge to present academic research. IORs have an alarming failure rate upwards of 60 per cent. Although the breakdown of trust is a well-documented critical component of their failure, specific research on IOR trust repair is limited. Design/methodology/approach – The research applied a ranked Delphi study utilising UK professionals' expertise in IOR management. Findings – The results provide two practical frameworks and several new methods for IOR trust repair; furthermore, they demonstrate consistency between professionally adopted IOR trust repair methods and those proposed academically. Research limitations/implications – The study ' s primary limitations resulted from being conducted at the lower end of its operating window, and only with panellists interested in trust repair. The implications for research are to direct investigations to the new IOR trust repair methods and to test when professionals would undertake trust repair methods. Practical implications – The IOR trust repair frameworks can be utilised retrospectively as a tool kit to repair damaged relationships. Additionally, they can be proactively embedded in IOR contract documentation, whereby parties agree to enact and abide by the frameworks, should relations deteriorate, before proceeding down legal avenues. Originality/value – This paper offers the first contribution from the UK professional community on IOR trust repair; they have provided new research areas for academics as well as practicable, pertinent frameworks for professionals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | trust; conflict resolution; Delphi study; inter organisational relationships; partnerships and alliances; trust repair |
| Index terms: | trust repair, window, methodology, contract documentation, repair, Delphi method, conflict resolution, partnership, investigation |
| Subjects: | psychology, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, partnership management, conflict resolution, maintenance engineering, research methods, architectural elements |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here