Hubbard, P (2015) Law, sex and the city: Regulating sexual entertainment venues in England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7(1), pp. 5-20. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to explore how municipal law, in its various guises, serves to police the boundaries of acceptable sexual conduct by considering how Sexual Entertainment Venues (SEVs) in British cities are controlled through diverse techniques of licensing and planning control. Design/methodology/approach – The paper describes the emergence of permissive new licensing controls that provide local authorities considerable control over SEVs. Licensing decisions, judicial review cases and planning inspectorate adjudications since the inception of the new powers are examined to explore the logic of judgements preventing SEVs operating in specific localities. Findings – Through analysis of case studies, it is shown that local authorities have almost total discretion to prevent SEVs operating in specific localities, particularly those undergoing, or anticipated to be undergoing, redevelopment and regeneration. Originality/value – This paper offers unique insights on the “scope” of municipal law by highlighting how land uses associated with “sexual minority” interests are regulated in the interests of urban regeneration, redevelopment and restructuring.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | planning; UK; sexuality; licensing; nuisance; sexual entertainment venue |
| Index terms: | sexuality, case study, adjudication, England, judicial review, minority, land use, local authority, licensing, nuisance, boundaries, emergence, Wales, redevelopment, urban regeneration, methodology |
| Subjects: | knowledge transfer, dispute resolution, data collection methods, legal systems, property law, real estate economics, Geography, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, regulatory law, sociology |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Ethics, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here