Shih, R C S; Gayley, A and Doro-on, A M (2005) Risk analysis of terrorism on U.S. Cargo transportation infrastructure. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2005, London, UK.
Abstract
In the past four years, national security has been a primary concern, initially regarding human health, and eventually including protection of sensitive infrastructure, the environment, and commerce from threats of terrorism. Safeguards employed have included change in policy, intrusion detection technology, increased surveillance, and improved intelligence. An innovative method of safeguarding cargo shipment exists as a technology currently reserved for limited and special applications: freight pipeline transhipment. Risk associated with this specialized form of U.S. infrastructure is developed as "what-if" scenario sequences. The severity of consequences is quantified by index numbers prescribed by the US Department of Home Land Security. Impacts of these hazards are then analyzed in more detail using a two-tier study, which focuses on the negative impact to human well-being, capital assets, and socio-economic stability. The risk assessment includes acceptability factors which are based on the incremental acceptable risks derived from revealed preference concepts. In summary, the risk assessment for terrorism on the infrastructure involves: (1) the evaluation of terrorism hazards to human health, the environment, and commerce; (2) terrorism activity scenario development; (3) risk estimation for different terrorist activities; and (4) risk acceptability analysis for the matrix of potential consequences. Most terror risk to infrastructure in the U.S. is immediately deemed unacceptable by society. However, in this study, it is found that when appropriate threat deterrent technologies are employed, risk acceptability can be achieved; whereas malicious threats to conventional surface transportation systems may remain indefinitely unacceptable, even given enhancement of security policies and safeguard measures.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fatalities; infrastructure; risk; cocio-economic and terrorism |
| Index terms: | commerce, capital assets, transportation infrastructure, well-being, risk assessment, surveillance, preference, fatalities, risk analysis, land, human health, society, pipeline, safeguards, estimation, stability, terrorism |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, monitoring and control systems, public and environmental health, structural engineering, terrorism studies, health risk and incident analysis, financial risk, asset management, occupational health and safety management, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems, communities and social development, mental health and wellbeing, real estate economics, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here