Mamutse, B (2016) Environmental liabilities in insolvency: an area ripe for reform? International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 8(3), pp. 243-268. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
Purpose The paper aims to examine the question whether legislative reform is the silver bullet for the problems generated by the failure of a company which is exposed to claims arising from the non-fulfilment of its environmental obligations. The limited capacity of the UK insolvency regime to facilitate the fulfilment of a debtor company’s environmental obligations is often illustrated with reference to some significant judicial decisions. However, no real picture has emerged of the frequency with which these issues arise, based on which firm proposals for reform could be advanced. This paper argues that greater regard should be paid to existing mechanisms which provide a means of enabling insolvency risks to be managed or minimised because these point towards the scope for these issues to be resolved through the environmental protection framework rather than through reliance on company and/or insolvency law. Design/methodology/approach Research was conducted into the statutory and non-statutory regulations (such as statutory guidance) and case law principles, which underpin the treatment of the claims against an insolvent (or potentially insolvent) company resulting from its environmental activities. This included research into policies which have a bearing on this area, developed through governmental and civic consultations and studies. Findings The paper concludes that the likelihood of a case for legislative reform being made out is weak, and the focus should accordingly shift to strengthening the effectiveness of existing law, policy and practice. Originality/value This paper is the first (in the UK context) to challenge the perceived need for reform in this area, engaging with recent examples of such corporate failures and the impact of recent legislative and policy developments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | insolvency; bankruptcy; corporate law; debt debtor creditor; disclaimer; environmental liabilities environmental obligations; company law |
| Index terms: | methodology, regulation, strengthening, disclaimer, corporate law, proposal, insolvency, liability, environmental protection, effectiveness, bankruptcy, company law, case law |
| Subjects: | project planning, legal systems, corporate law, economic analysis, political science, environmental engineering, liability law, contractual condition, structural engineering, performance management, research methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here