Grecksch, K and Holzhausen, J (2017) Property rights revisited: Are narratives the way forward? International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 9(2), pp. 94-107. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
This paper shows how property rights predominantly shape discussions about the governance of natural resources and thereby neglect questions of identities and alternative solutions to govern natural resources revealing that property rights are a social concept dominant in the industrialised-world.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | stereotypes; narratives; identity; natural resources; property rights; environmental governance |
| Index terms: | narrative, governance, stereotype, identity, environmental governance, natural resource, property rights |
| Subjects: | environmental policy, real estate economics, environmental resource management, qualitative and interpretive research, sociology, business |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here