Skaik, S (2017) Operational problems and solutions of statutory complex adjudication: Stakeholders' perspectives. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 9(2), pp. 162-175. ISSN 1756-1450
Abstract
The views of industry stakeholders regarding some operational problems of statutory adjudication reveal the parties usually investing in adjudication by appointing legal advisers and/or technical experts if considerable monetary amount is subject of dispute resulting in more complex payment dispute.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adjudicators; judicial review; law reform; security of payment; statutory adjudication |
| Index terms: | security of payment, judicial review, adjudication, dispute, law reform, statutory adjudication, adjudicator |
| Subjects: | legal systems, warranties, dispute resolution, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here