Establishing underlying structures of safety performance measures using factor analysis of data on construction workers in Gauteng, South Africa

Okoro, C S and Musonda, I (2017) Establishing underlying structures of safety performance measures using factor analysis of data on construction workers in Gauteng, South Africa. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 1(2), pp. 55-64. ISSN 2521-0165

Abstract

The health and safety (H&S) of site workers in the construction industry has been overwhelmingly studied for decades. However, there is scant literature which analyses underlying structures of safety performance measures especially as related to their unhealthy and unsafe eating behavior. The paper presents findings on an exploratory factor analysis of H&S performance measures. A 10-item questionnaire which was developed after an extensive literature review was used to collect empirical data on SP of construction workers in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. Findings revealed that safety performance of site workers could be reasonably measured by two constructs. The two constructs were clearly defined as trailing and prevailing. The emerged trailing measures were named lagging indicators while the prevailing ones were designated as leading indicators. The results support extant literature which advocates the use of both leading and lagging safety performance indicators for effectively assessing construction workers' safety performance. The study provides evidence which could be beneficial in psychometric evaluation of construction workers' safety performance and behaviours on construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: factor analysis; health and safety; South Africa; questionnaire survey; workers
Index terms: safety performance, South Africa, questionnaire, evidence, survey, literature review, construction site, performance measure, health and safety, exploratory factor analysis, construction worker, construction industry, factor analysis
Subjects: statistical analysis, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, health safety and environment, Geography, performance measurement, data analysis and analytics, work location, practitioner, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Site Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here